MORNING GLORY: The VP debate is an example of Kamala Harris’s horrible judgment when it comes to picking staff
The recent Vice Presidential debate between Senator Kamala Harris and Vice President Mike Pence was highly anticipated, especially given the current political climate in the United States. While the debate covered a range of important topics, one issue that stood out was Senator Harris’s choice of staff, particularly in relation to the handling of the debate.
Senator Harris’s decision to have her staff request plexiglass barriers for the debate stage, citing concerns over the Vice President’s potential exposure to COVID-19 due to outbreaks in the White House, was met with criticism from many quarters. Critics argued that this move was unnecessary, given that both participants had recently tested negative for the virus and that the CDC guidelines did not recommend the use of plexiglass barriers in such a setting.
Furthermore, the way Senator Harris’s staff handled the request for plexiglass barriers raised questions about their communication skills and judgment. Rather than engage in open dialogue with the debate organizers and Vice President Pence’s team, Senator Harris’s staff reportedly acted unilaterally, leading to a last-minute scramble to accommodate the request.
This incident sheds light on a broader pattern of poor judgment when it comes to picking staff that has been evident throughout Senator Harris’s political career. From her time as California’s Attorney General to her tenure in the Senate, Senator Harris has been criticized for surrounding herself with advisors and aides who lack experience, competence, or ethical integrity.
In selecting staff, it is crucial for a political leader to choose individuals who are not only capable and skilled but also possess the ability to navigate complex situations with grace and diplomacy. Senator Harris’s misstep in handling the plexiglass barrier situation at the VP debate is just one example of how her poor judgment in picking staff can have far-reaching implications.
The role of a Vice President is one of immense responsibility and requires a judicious selection of staff members who can support and amplify the leader’s message and vision. Senator Harris’s choice of staff, as evidenced by the VP debate incident, raises concerns about her ability to make sound decisions in this regard.
In conclusion, while the VP debate provided a platform for Senator Harris to showcase her policy positions and leadership qualities, it also highlighted her poor judgment when it comes to picking staff. Moving forward, it is imperative for Senator Harris to reevaluate her approach to staffing and surround herself with individuals who can help elevate her candidacy and support her in effectively executing the duties of the Vice Presidency.
